My take on the VP Debate
Watched the debates Thursday night. (Yeah, I do the politics thing!) Hardly as entertaining as I thought it would be. I would've much rather watch Tina Fey and Steve Martin do a parody. One thing does burn me up, though. I think it is insulting to women everywhere that Sarah Palin was somehow considered successful for not falling on her face. As much as women don't like the glass ceiling, we should despise the closer tee. Low expectations are as dangerous as limited opportunity. If she's going to be in the race for vice president, we need to apply to her the same standard as we would a man. We should expect the same level of intelligence and the same command of the issues as we would from any other candidate. Why? Because we can meet it! When Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama went at it in the Democratic Primary, nobody was saying, "Wow, Hillary isn't making mistakes! She can win!" The stride she made was that she proved we can go toe-to-toe, we can be as capable and knowledgeable as any man. I respected Obama because he never tried to belittle her or act as if he expected anything else. A woman meeting the same academic or professional standard as men is normal! (And to all of you trying to apply this to my arguments for the WNBA -- this isn't about dunking, this is about mental aptitude and political expertise.) A woman not making herself look stupid is not an accomplishment! The fact that Sarah Palin didn't implode at the podium is not a victory. That's like somebody saying I had a good game because I didn't double-dribble. Or being surprised when a Black man "speaks so well." Or Sue Bird accusing me of not knowing the meaning of unevolved and antiquated. LOL Sorry. That whole hooray-she-didn't-fall-on-her-face bit just pisses me off a little. Anyway, there were some highlights, though: *Sarah Palin was a gangsta. She came out practically from the get-go and punk'd the moderator and Biden. "I ain't answering yo questions, fool!" I can't believe they let that go. I would've kept asking her the same question. Why agree to a debate if you're not going to, uh, debate? She should've at least explained why she was different from Bush when Biden went on that tirade about McCain being the same as Bush. *Biden choking up talking about his kids was deep. Something about seeing a grown man cry, or on the verge of tears, is touching. Well, not any grown man. It's always some dude crying on Project Runway and, somehow, it doesn't tug at the heart strings. While we're talking about tears, it is kind of shady that when Biden cries, it's accepted as genuine and moving (and no disrespect to him, what he went through has to be painful still). But when it was a woman, such as when Hillary Clinton caught a little fur ball in her throat during the primaries ? actually, it wasn't even choking up as much as it was a sudden switch to a somber tone ? it's a sign of weakness! What if Palin had choked up? The Sandman woulda came on stage with a cane and yanked her off and asked her if she was on her period! It just amazes me, the double standard. *Those winks into the camera were a knee-slapper. What was that? I felt like I just got holla'd at in the mall, like she wrote her number on my hand outside of Cinnabon and the wink was the goodbye. C'mon, Mrs. P! This is the presidential arena here. The winking and the Joe Six-Pack lines make you sound like the prep jock running for Student Body President. This debate was the time to show them you are also intellectual and intelligent. We know the hockey mom, pit bull with lipstick, moose-hunting stuff. You missed a chance to show us more. In fact, you probably made yourself a little too down home. Nuff politics for now. Check out the WNBA Finals. Game 3. Going down tomorrow night.
- TAGS:
- Golf
- Golf
- Steve Martin
- WNBA






hoopsdreams said October 04, 2008
I don't know if Palin's folksy delivery is a show or if that is just who she is. If that is who she then I would rather have her be genuine then to try and pretend to be something she is not. It certainly has little to do with her ability to lead or contribute.
I agree that HIlary was not treated fairly. It was almost an approach of ,"let's wait for her to screw up or get emotional like a woman." If anything I liked seeing that side of Hillary as she seemed so mechanical to me. Regarding the double standard it all boils down to reputation. Women are perceived to be more emotional then men. I don't know if I would agree with that. I think they "express" their emotion more than men. Women traditionally go to tears to cope and men go to anger, not wanting to deal with their emotions. However, anger is being "emotional" just as crying is. Just expressed differently.
I really enjoy reading your blog. You are very passionate and articulate. Please keem em' coming!
mercfan3 said October 04, 2008
I don't think the Palin "not falling on her face" thing, was anything to do with women though. It most likely has to do with Palin..she had some bad moments with Katie Couric, and it was important for Palin to not fall on her face.
comparing her to Hillary is a little unfair, Hillary's actually a good debater and tends to make anyone she's debating look foolish..*unless they just sit there and agree with her..sorry, had to take the jab at Obama* I would have loved to have seen VP Barbie go up against Hillary, just because of how funny it would be. Senator Clinton would have torn Sarah apart. :D
Speaking of Obama, he needs to get more cutthroat in these things. We all know he's smarter than McCain, he needs to show it. Stop blabbering, stop conceding points, and hit him hard.
Justwannawinna said October 04, 2008
Boomdodger1 said October 04, 2008
Spotella said October 04, 2008
jakobkagel said October 04, 2008
college basketball 24/7
www.collegebasketball247.blogspot.com
JASON323_310 said October 04, 2008
I HEARD THAT MOST WNBA,NBA,AND NFL PLAYERS WERE VOTING FOR OBAMA? IF THAT'S TRUE HIT ME BACK!!!
woodsey44 replied October 04, 2008
tigernike23 replied October 05, 2008
woodsey44 replied October 06, 2008
tigernike23 replied October 05, 2008
GSWgirl replied October 06, 2008
woodsey44 replied October 06, 2008
mrbecker712 said October 04, 2008
Yet you like Biden, because why? He didn't even know when FDR served, thinks us paying taxes is "patriotic", and was proven to have lied outright 10 times during the debate Tuesday.
Sure, go ahead and vote Obama. Enjoy your higher taxes, your government susidized health care with lesser doctors. Enjoy your socialistic values of wealth redistribution.
JASON323_310 replied October 04, 2008
YOU BEEN READING TO MUCH OF THAT OBAMANATION! LMAO
jfranzen replied October 05, 2008
How do you know Biden was lying? That does require, after all, special knowledge of intent.
Will the doctors in an Obama administration really be different than the doctors in a McCain presidency?
How about your scare tactic? The better doctors will renounce their citizenship or stop practicing medicine and we'll only have lesser ones.
Regarding socialism, Reagan said the same thing about medicare 50 years ago. and we still don't have socialism. Scare tactics. Ironic that you would toss that accusation out and then do it.
I haven't even mentioned your irresponsible reiteration of one of the more shallow Rovian claims that "Obama spent more time writing books than pieces of legislation." Obama has "sponsored" (few senators "author" legislation due to the presence of PAC and corporate lobbyists) over 100 bills and resolutions.
I may not agree with spluffy, but I'm pretty sure I won't be turning to you for guidance either.
Let's proffer opinions that are fact based, and not make a mockery of US democracy with propaganda.
Smootho21 said October 04, 2008
Smootho21 said October 04, 2008
JASON323_310 replied October 04, 2008
LIKE.. I DONT CARE WHO YOU'RE VOTING FOR AS LONG AS WE KEEP THESE REPUBLICANS OUT OF OFFICE I'M ALL FOR IT!!
Mattyboy said October 04, 2008
Smootho21 said October 04, 2008
mrbecker712 said October 04, 2008
JASON323_310 replied October 04, 2008
jfranzen replied October 05, 2008
they have the official records and you'll see very simply that you are repeating a web-rumor.
tikitmb said October 04, 2008
I look forward to an America that takes care of ALL their people despite their social, economic, racial, and gender status. It only can make us stronger, in the eyes of the world they can finally see us as true leaders that lead by example not dictators whose moral compass seems to be lead more often than not by greed and politics.
AlanaG said October 05, 2008
ekimswish said October 05, 2008
Spotella replied October 05, 2008
hoopla said October 05, 2008
If this country were coming off of eight years of peace and prosperity (like we were in the 2000 election) then maybe this whole 'folksy' Palin character would appeal to more people. But these are SERIOUS times we are living in right now. Our country is at a crossroads. Things ain't looking too good. Forgive me for not finding all this Joe Six Pack, soccer mom, maverick, "Say it ain't so, Joe" BS cute. For everyone that keeps saying that Palin is just "keepin' it real," in the words of Chris Rock..."yeah she's keepin' it real...real dumb."
Another great post, DT. Keep 'em coming :-)
bballfan said October 05, 2008
Spotella replied October 05, 2008
Do you really want someone in there that doesn't know how to handle things????.
BookerT replied October 05, 2008
caune0405 replied October 11, 2008
Because she did, five times, sooo wrong!
and now that troopergate report #1 is out it looks like she'd fit right in in Washington :O
bballfan said October 05, 2008
Spotella replied October 05, 2008
BookerT replied October 05, 2008
notice how her face is perfectly done via Botox and underneath is Tommy Tutone color skins....But I love her glasses
Spotella replied October 05, 2008
Amazing that someone who is "for" her would add that caption to a post. It's comical!
woodsey44 replied October 05, 2008
BookerT replied October 05, 2008
Spotella replied October 05, 2008
bballfan replied October 05, 2008
Alaska population:683,478
Difference 181,286. Wow what a big difference.
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=state+population&aq=f&oq=
The difference is she is the one who has been in her state actually running things and make decisions. And Spotella, I know that she said she was a Washington outsider. You ask me if I wanted someone who doesn't know how to handle things? I answered you. The picture was just an added bonus....;)
Spotella replied October 05, 2008
Smootho21 said October 05, 2008
Spotella replied October 05, 2008
Smootho21 said October 05, 2008
BrockSamson said October 05, 2008
Best summation I've heard.
Zukny1 said October 05, 2008
She is there to win the Evangelical vote ( christian vote ) Mccain had a problem landing the conservatives because he is so liberal in their eyes.
On another note she is hot as hell and i want her body
Spotella replied October 05, 2008
With McCain's age a VP is much more important, though there are many people these days that live to be 80 or 90 or even 100, his age is an issue. (As sad as that is). I understand, even a 30 year old can pass away but you have to play the numbers here. Look how much each president has aged during their presidency in the last 30 + years. I'm not so sure McCain has it in him to sustain that aging. I could be wrong, but I'm playing the numbers, so his VP is an important pick to me. That brings up the question of whether she will hold to his political values or will she stick to hers. I'm not sure. It's all things people must think about.
Spotella replied October 05, 2008
mercurylover said October 05, 2008
YUPIMCOOOL said October 04, 2008
csmhnv said October 04, 2008
indus1 said October 04, 2008
comment below viewing threshold
show comment
gunaxin said October 04, 2008
justice33 said October 05, 2008
That's like somebody saying I had a good game because I didn't double-dribble. Or being surprised when a Black man "speaks so well." (Did Palin believe she was a success because she didn't fall on her face or was that the media's opinion. And where did the whole black man speaking well thing come from? Did Palin insinuate that black men could not speak well?)
Didnt get to watch the whole thing so if I missed something, let me know.
djay53 said October 05, 2008
Pinkpanthrrr replied October 06, 2008
Zukny1 said October 05, 2008
al-gore didnt do shit
caune0405 replied October 05, 2008
Honey were you there?
Maybe you were the rug or something?
He met with President Clinton every freakin mornig, attended every important policy meeting and contributed invaluable insight...all without taking away any of our civil liberties or shooting anyone in the face..That's good work!
comment below viewing threshold
show comment
hoopla said October 05, 2008
www.adennak.com/archives/palinflow.gif
caune0405 said October 05, 2008
After Obama becomes President you have to win another Championship because meeting him in the Rose Garden, now that would be brilliant!
tigernike23 said October 05, 2008
Biden is a smarta**, but we need a smarta** in Washington that won't put up with the bull thats going on. Honestly though, I had to watch the debate, my Cubs were tanking to your Dodgers. I'm just waiting for Palin to say "oh don't ya know!" in that Alaskan-Canadian-Upper Midwestern accent of hers. I've heard (and someone please correct me if I'm wrong), that she's not doing any more interviews outside of the softballs at Fox News, and Rush, and Hannity, etc. Now come on, she's a big girl. Let's hear what she's got to say. It's pathetic to say she did well by not screwing up, she's not Rex Grossman!
mrbecker712 replied October 06, 2008
Maybe she should go on a rock start our of Europe like Obama. Would she get respect then???
JLannd said October 05, 2008
If it were Palin and Biden for President, she wins. I liked the policies on Education and the Economics of Alaska, she mentioned and they aren't the same ones McCain is presenting to the country. Obama still has the edge at this point. McCain needs to do better in Tuesday's debate in order to have a chance. However, the next President will have his financial hands full with the way the econonmy is going and that is often how a President is judged. For example, Reagan and Clinton are respected because of their economic savy not because of the other things they did. George W. got re-elected because the economy was doing well. Whoever is next, will have a hard time unless the economy turns around.
mrbecker712 said October 06, 2008
Spotella replied October 06, 2008
Graybear2012 replied October 06, 2008
Click here for the top five media conglomerates:
http://www.corporations.org/media/
Or here for the top ten worldwide:
http://www.thenation.com/special/bigten.html
Unfortunately, not a "liberal" corporation among them. No wonder we get Paris Hilton/Brittany Spears everyday, all the time, while investigative reporting of real issues has tanked.
And no wonder that the largest transfer of wealth ever in the history of the US (from the hands of many to the hands of a few) has gone unnoticed by the majority of our electorate – fatcat media corporations don't want anyone to know. Simply follow the money.
We truly live in Orwellian times. When you can call these media conglomerates "liberal" and thereby steer the discourse, we're in deep, deep trouble. Lies as truth. *sigh*
mrbecker712 replied October 06, 2008
Pinkpanthrrr replied October 06, 2008
mrbecker712 replied October 06, 2008
BookerT replied October 06, 2008
Did anyone see the Radicalism Obama last night on Fox:::As open as I am like a 711, Fox is Full of Sh** and BS....Its so sad how they do this and dumb ass Americans beleive it.....Hannity is a scum bum, i want Kimbo Slice to knok out that MoFuka....Dude is more brainwashed than you Becker, but i give you credit, your voicing your opinion as typical as it is.....Keep hope alive, politicians are the joke of the country, we need change, not what Barack Obama is saying cuz thats BS rhetoric...
terra1969 said October 06, 2008
Annt74 said October 06, 2008
Annt74 replied October 06, 2008
Spotella said October 06, 2008
A man died and went to heaven. As he stood in front of
St. Peter at the Pearly Gates, he saw a huge wall of clocks behind him.
He asked, 'What are all those clocks?'
St. Peter answered, 'Those are Lie-Clocks.
Everyone on Earth has a Lie-Clock.
Every time you lie the hands on your clock will move.'
'Oh,' said the man, 'whose clock is that?'
'That's Mother Teresa's. The hands have never moved, indicating
that she never told a lie.'
'Incredible,' said the man. 'And whose clock is that one?'
St. Peter responded, 'That's Abraham Lincoln's clock. The hands have moved twice, telling us that Abe told only two lies in his entire life.'
'Where's President Bush's clock?' asked the man.
'Bush's clock is in Jesus' office.
He's using it as a ceiling fan.
Annt74 replied October 07, 2008
LibFan73 said October 06, 2008
I wish more athletes would have the balls to speak up the way you do!
jerseygirl said October 06, 2008
mrbecker712 said October 07, 2008
bballfan said October 07, 2008
JLannd said October 09, 2008